that was it?

Wait, that was it? That was the woman-hating, extremist, anti-choice, "extraordinarily offensive and demeaning"* Tim Tebow ad that pro-choicers are still making such a fuss about?

Let's see it again.

Pam said she was happy to have her "Timmy." He came up and gave her a big hug. "I love you's" were exchanged. A cutesy song was played. The end. Which part of that was so horrendous?

I had heard the ad was supposed to be relatively light-hearted and uncontroversial, but if you read my last post, you know even I was under the impression it would show "the other side." Honestly, if it hadn't received so much hype, I'm confident it would have gone without notice; you would have no idea it had anything to do with abortion, let alone the pro-life position. Like Tim, the commercial was soft-spoken and nonaggressive.

The fact that pro-choice organizations like NARAL, NOW, and WMF (among a host of others) have spent the past week shouting in a rage against Pam, Tim, and Focus on the Family is just one more confirmation that "pro-choice" almost always means "pro-abortion." If these "pro-choice" leaders claim their platform is respect for "women's private reproductive choices," why don't they respect Pam's? Apparently she is happy with her choice and wants to tell people about it. It's obvious these fringe groups only want women to talk about one choice: abortion.

Pro-abortion. Not pro-choice.

NOW, the "National Organization for Women," should really call themselves the "National Organization for Women Who Choose Abortion." They clearly are not for all women, so why pretend to be?

Vita Pro Omni!

*according to NOW